cisco ikev2 error address type not supported

For more information, refer to IKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: The display of Helpful votes has changed click to read more! 05-18-2021 12:04 PM. This is reposted from the Networking Academy area since there were no replies. It contains: ISAKMP Header (SPI/version/flags), SAi1 (cryptographic algorithm that IKE initiator supports), KEi (DH public Key value of the initiator), and N (Initiator Nonce). #crypto ikev2 policy cisco. The keys used for the encryption and integrity protection are derived from SKEYID and are known as: SK_e (encryption), SK_a (authentication), SK_d is derived and used for derivation of further keying material for CHILD_SAs, and a separate SK_e and SK_a is computed for each direction. Uses certificates for the authentication mechanism. Cisco Bug: CSCvp93211 - Garbage value in IKEv2 error debug This module describes the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) protocol. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. For more information, refer to IKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. Same in every possible way. E.g. Thanks again for this article. Update: This was a version error, using wrong version of anyconnect, this has now been resolved. Responder sends the response for IKE_AUTH. The difference between IKEv1 and IKEv2 is that, in the latter, the Child SAs are created as part of AUTH exchange itself. Be aware the static route will only be withdrawn from the routing table if the Tunnel goes down. 1 Accepted Solution. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of crafted IKEv2 SA-Init packets. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. If the SA offers include different DH groups, KEi must be an element of the group the initiator expects the responder to accept. Router2 sends out the responder message to Router 1. #pre-shared-key cisco1234. If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is not rekeying an existing SA, the N payload MUST be omitted. Relevant Configuration:crypto ikev2 proposal PHASE1-prop encryption 3des aes-cbc-128 integrity sha1 group 2 crypto ikev2 keyring KEYRNG peer peer2 address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 hostname host2 pre-shared-key local cisco pre-shared-key remote cisco, *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: SA, version: 2.0 Exchange type:IKE_SA_INIT,flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 0, length: 449 Payload contents: SANext payload: KE, reserved: 0x0, length: 48 last proposal: 0x0, reserved: 0x0, length: 44 Proposal: 1, Protocol id: IKE, SPI size: 0, #trans: 4 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 12 type: 1, reserved: 0x0, id: AES-CBC last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 2, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA1 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 3, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA96 last transform: 0x0, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 4, reserved: 0x0, id: DH_GROUP_1024_MODP/Group 2 KENext payload: N, reserved: 0x0, length: 136 DH group: 2, Reserved: 0x0 NNext payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 VID Next payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 23 VID Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 21 NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP) Next payload: CERTREQ, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP CERTREQ Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 105 Cert encoding Hash and URL of PKIX NOTIFY(HTTP_CERT_LOOKUP_SUPPORTED) Next payload: NONE, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: HTTP_CERT_LOOKUP_SUPPORTED, *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Cisco DeleteReason Notify is enabled *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_CHK4_ROLE *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event:EV_START_TMR *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_NO_EVENT *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:New ikev2 sa request admitted *Nov 11 19:30:34.822: IKEv2:Incrementing outgoing negotiating sa count by one, *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Got a packet from dispatcher *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Got a packet from dispatcher *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Processing an item off the pak queue, I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event:EV_START_TMR, *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: SA, version: 2.0 Exchange type: IKE_SA_INIT, flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 0, length: 449 Payload contents: SANext payload: KE, reserved: 0x0, length: 48 last proposal: 0x0, reserved: 0x0, length: 44 Proposal: 1, Protocol id: IKE, SPI size: 0, #trans: 4 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 12 type: 1, reserved: 0x0, id: AES-CBC last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 2, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA1 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 3, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA96 last transform: 0x0, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 4, reserved: 0x0, id: DH_GROUP_1024_MODP/Group 2 KENext payload: N, reserved: 0x0, length: 136 DH group: 2, Reserved: 0x0 NNext payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Parse Vendor Specific Payload: CISCO-DELETE-REASON VID Next payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 23 *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Parse Vendor Specific Payload: (CUSTOM) VID Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 21 *Nov 11 19:30:34.823: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP) Next payload: CERTREQ, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP CERTREQ Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 105 Cert encoding Hash and URL of PKIX *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: HTTP_CERT_LOOKUP_SUPPORTED NOTIFY(HTTP_CERT_LOOKUP_SUPPORTED) Next payload: NONE, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: HTTP_CERT_LOOKUP_SUPPORTED, *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_WAIT_INIT Event: EV_RECV_INIT *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Processing IKE_SA_INIT message *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_CHK4_NOTIFY *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_VERIFY_MSG *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_PROC_MSG *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_DETECT_NAT *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Process NAT discovery notify *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Processing nat detect src notify *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Remote address matched *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Processing nat detect dst notify *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Local address matched *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):No NAT found *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_CHK_NAT_T *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_PROC_INIT Event: EV_CHK_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.824: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event:EV_GEN_DH_SECRET *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_NO_EVENT *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_DH_SECRET_RESP *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event:EV_GEN_SKEYID *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Generate skeyid *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Cisco DeleteReason Notify is enabled *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: INIT_DONE Event: EV_CHK4_ROLE *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_GET_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:Sending config data to toolkit *Nov 11 19:30:34.831: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000000 CurState: I_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_EAP. Getting "no pre-shared key with peer" in IKEv2 setup on csr1000 - Cisco cEdge supports standard IKE tunnels in 19.x. Router 1 receives the IKE_SA_INIT response packet from Router 2. The documentation set for this product strives to use bias-free language. 189035: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):IKE Proposal: 1, SPI size: 0 (initial negotiation), AES-CBC SHA256 SHA256 DH_GROUP_2048_MODP/Group 14, 189036: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Retrieve configured trustpoint(s), 189037: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Retrieved trustpoint(s): 'TP-self-signed-653483565', 189038: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Get Public Key Hashes of trustpoints, 189039: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Getting of Public Key Hashes of trustpoints FAILED, 189040: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:Failed to retrieve Certificate Issuer list, 189041: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Sending Packet [To 2.2.2.2:500/From 1.1.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0], Initiator SPI : 8A15E970577C6140 - Responder SPI : 0550071FA9DFE718 Message id: 0, SA KE N VID VID NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP) NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP), 189042: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Completed SA init exchange, 189043: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Starting timer (30 sec) to wait for auth message, 189044: *Aug 8 14:01:22.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:4500/To 1.1.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0], Initiator SPI : 8A15E970577C6140 - Responder SPI : 0550071FA9DFE718 Message id: 1, IDi NOTIFY(INITIAL_CONTACT) NOTIFY(Unknown - 16396) IDr AUTH CFG NOTIFY(ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT) NOTIFY(NON_FIRST_FRAGS) SA TSi TSr, 189045: *Aug 8 14:01:22.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Stopping timer to wait for auth message, 189046: *Aug 8 14:01:22.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Checking NAT discovery, 189047: *Aug 8 14:01:22.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):NAT OUTSIDE found, 189048: *Aug 8 14:01:22.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):NAT detected float to init port 4500, resp port 4500, 189049: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Searching policy based on peer's identity '10.5.1.70' of type 'IPv4 address', 189050: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:found matching IKEv2 profile 'FlexVPN', 189051: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key from profile keyring keys, 189052: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:% Matched peer block 'DYNAMIC', 189053: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address 1.1.1.1, 189054: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:Found Policy 'ikev2policy', 189055: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Verify peer's policy, 189056: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Peer's policy verified, 189057: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Get peer's authentication method, 189058: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Peer's authentication method is 'PSK', 189059: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Get peer's preshared key for 10.5.1.70, 189060: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Verify peer's authentication data, 189061: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Use preshared key for id 10.5.1.70, key len 7, 189062: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Generate IKEv2 authentication data, 189063: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] IKEv2 authentication data generation PASSED, 189064: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Verification of peer's authenctication data PASSED, 189065: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Processing INITIAL_CONTACT, 189066: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Received valid config mode data. Working output: #show crypto ikev2 profile IKEv2 profile: default Ref Count: 4 Match criteria: Fvrf: global Local address/interface: none Identities: none Certificate maps: mymap Local identity: none <----- Remote identity: none Conditions: FlexVPN No local identity configured, relaying on global default. Select the " Show Advanced Settings " option on the top left and make sure the enable box is checked. In my case even after adding the ACL entry there was another step which was needed to fix this tunnel. crypto ikev2 authorization policy FlexVPN, encryption 3des aes-cbc-128 aes-cbc-192 aes-cbc-256, crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-GCM esp-gcm, crypto ipsec transform-set AES-CBC esp-aes 256 esp-sha256-hmac, crypto ipsec transform-set AES-CBC1 esp-aes esp-sha-hmac, crypto ipsec transform-set AES-CBC2 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac, set transform-set AES-CBC AES-CBC1 AES-CBC2 ESP-GCM, ip local pool FlexVPN 10.7.1.231 10.7.1.239. I am trying to remote access to my Cisco 897VA Router using pre shared key only through Windows 10, Mac OS X and iPhone builtin IKEv2 VPN. "You can create the IPsec tunnel in the transport VPN (VPN 0) and in any service VPN (VPN 1 through 65530, except for 512). The problem is that a 'VPN Interface IPSEC' is not available: https://www.zscaler.com/resources/solution-briefs/partner-viptela-cisco-sd-wan-deployment.pdf. Configure Phase 1 Settings For IKEv1. Router 1 initiates the CHILD_SA exchange. The sample configuration connects a Cisco ASA device to an Azure route-based VPN gateway. *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:KMI message 12 consumed. currently using 4.8, seems to have solved all issues. The Responder tunnel usually comes up before the Initiator. ASA IKEv2 Debugs for Remote Access VPN Troubleshooting - Cisco Customers Also Viewed These Support Documents, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/flexvpn/115907-config-flexvpn-wcca-00.html. The first CHILD_SA is created for the proxy_ID pair that matches the trigger packet. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. Securing End-to-End IPsec connections by using IKEv2 IKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging, Technical Support & Documentation - Cisco Systems, Router 1 receives a packet that matches the crypto acl for peer ASA 10.0.0.2. Refer toCisco Technical Tips Conventionsfor more information on document conventions. Cisco site-to-site VPN tunnel Failed to find a matching policy 0 Helpful Share Reply JW_UK Beginner In response to JW_UK Options 09-28-2019 03:19 AM Exceptions may be present in the documentation due to language that is hardcoded in the user interfaces of the product software, language used based on RFP documentation, or language that is used by a referenced third-party product. Configuring Internet Key Exchange Version 2 - Cisco what i am missing here. High Performance gateway uses IKEv2 and have applied the following IKE policy on Azure Gateway. Router 2 receives and verifies the authentication data received from Router 1. IPSEC profile: this is phase2, we will create the transform set in here. For more information on the differences and an explanation of the packet exchange, refer toIKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. When i run debug on Cisco ASA i found following, also when tunnel is up i am seeing following messaged in debugging, not sure what is going on. I'll log a TAC case next. Responder verifies and processes the IKE_INIT message: (1) Chooses crypto suite from those offered by the initiator, (2) computes its own DH secret key, and (3) it computes a skeyid value, from which all keys can be derived for this IKE_SA. Communication over the IPSec Tunnel should be done via VPN1. You can configure IPsec on tunnels for VPN 1 through 65530, except for 512. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/System-Interface/systems-interfaces-book/configure-interfaces.html. No action taken. Note. Its a bug where the ZScaler dumps an IP address based on the config_exchange request sent by cEdge devices. My assumption is that although the IPSEC is created on the service side, by sourcing the tunnel from the interface with a public IP address in VPN0, the cEdge would VRF jump to VPN0.

Was Danielle De Barbarac A Real Person, Margaritaville Usvi Menu, The Internet Revolution And Digital Future Technology 2018 Reflection, Massachusetts College Fairs 2022, Jarrett Kemp Age, Articles C