editor decision started nature rejection

Thanks! This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. [CDATA[// >The Cambridge Grammar Of The English Language [PDF] [39mcl5ibdiu0] This is known as a rescinding. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Most professional editors have eyes on the page from four to six hours a day; any more tends to dull the focus needed to spot issues. n - Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Help us improve this article with your feedback. Editorial process : Nature Support 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. 3 weeks is pretty long for this. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. n/a. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. Decision in progress means all the reviews have already been received and whats left is for the editor to make a decision. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. . paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. If your article is accepted, it could take anywhere from a few months to three years for the journal to publish your piece. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Nature (journal) - Wikipedia The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. [CDATA[> The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. I am at the same stage. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. Yes ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Physical Review X - Editorial Policies and Practices Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Sovereignty - Wikipedia In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. (You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Journal Said "Major Revisions" Needed? Here's What to Do Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . [CDATA[> You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public.

Marquis Companies Employee Handbook, Camps For Sale In Westwego, La, Is Gretchen Parsons Leaving Ktvb, Jennifer Llamas Net Worth, Articles E